Analysis of Constitutional Court Decision Number 70/PUU-XXII/2024 on the Age Requirement for Regional Head Candidates and Its Implications for the Democratic System in Indonesia

Authors

  • Pitri Wulandari Wulandari Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
  • Andryan Andryan Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33751/jhss.v10i1.69

Keywords:

Constitutional Court, Age Requirement, Local Democracy

Abstract

The Regulation Of The Minimum Age Requirement For Regional Head Candidates Has Become A Significant Constitutional Issue In Indonesia Following Constitutional Court Decision Number 70/PUU-XXII/2024. The Debate Surrounding This Decision Concerns The Extent To Which Age Limitations Constitute A Legitimate Regulatory Measure Or An Unconstitutional Restriction On Political Rights As Guaranteed Under The 1945 Constitution. This Study Aims To Analyze The Legal Reasoning Of The Mahkamah Konstitusi In The Decision, To Assess The Constitutional Compatibility Of The Age Requirement Under The Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, And To Examine Its Implications For Local Democratic Processes, Particularly In Relation To Leadership Regeneration And Political Participation. This Research Employs A Normative Legal Method Using Statutory, Case, And Conceptual Approaches. Primary Legal Materials Include Constitutional Provisions, Relevant Electoral Laws, And Constitutional Court Decision Number 70/PUU-XXII/2024, While Secondary Materials Consist Of Scholarly Literature And Prior Studies On Political Rights And Democratic Theory. The Analysis Is Conducted Through Qualitative Prescriptive Interpretation By Applying Constitutional Principles Such As Equality Before The Law, Proportionality, Legal Certainty, And Popular Sovereignty. The Findings Indicate That The Constitutional Court Grounded Its Reasoning In The Doctrine Of Open Legal Policy, Affirming That The Determination Of Age Requirements Falls Within Legislative Authority As Long As It Does Not Contradict Explicit Constitutional Norms. The Age Limitation Is Considered Constitutionally Valid Because It Is Based On Objective And Rational Criteria And Serves The Legitimate Aim Of Ensuring Leadership Maturity And Institutional Stability. Furthermore, The Decision Has Broader Implications For Indonesia’s Local Democracy By Structuring Leadership Regeneration, Influencing Political Party Recruitment Mechanisms, And Reinforcing Legal Certainty In Electoral Governance While Maintaining Democratic Inclusiveness Within Constitutional Boundaries.

References

[1] B. Darma, “Analysis of the Constitutional Court’s Authority to Change the Age Requirements for Presidential Candidates and Vice Presidential Candidates in the Constitutional Court’s Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023,” NEGREI: Academic Journal of Law and Governance, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 273–298, 2024, doi: 10.29240/negrei.v4i2.11579.

[2] Santoso Budi Nursal Umar and Waluyo Slamet Pradoto, “Analysis and Legal Implications of the Constitutional Court’s Decision on the Determination of the Age Limit for Presidential and Vice Presidential Candidates,” Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 281–288, 2025, doi: 10.62383/jembatan.v2i3.2444.

[3] S. Syafrizal, F. A. Akmal, and S. Purwanda, “Human Rights Review on Age Limitation of Candidates for Regional Heads,” Amsir Law Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 21–27, 2024, doi: 10.36746/alj.v6i1.590.

[4] R. Yulia Alfito, A. Badri, M. Ikhwan, T. Wahyono, S. Divo, and O. Fedraa Naldi, “Jurnal Kritis Studi Hukum Batas Usia Capres-Cawapres: Sebuah Kajian Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi,” Jurnal Kritis Studi Hukum, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 8, 2024.

[5] J. Inconsistency et al., “Supremacy of Law : Journal of Legal Studies,” vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 213–236, 2024, doi: 10.14421/ad8p7x10.

[6] H. A. Ate, “Analysis of the constitutional court’s decision on the age limit of presidential and vice-presidential candidates in the perspective of Rechtstaat,” Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic and Practice Studies, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 233–239, 2024, doi: 10.35912/jomaps.v2i2.2159.

[7] D. Gusman and P. D. C. Oliveira, “Age Limitations for Presidential and Vice Presidential Candidates Post Constitutional Court Ruling Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 A Democratic Perspective,” Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 607, 2023, doi: 10.25216/jhp.12.3.2023.607-628.

[8] Rahimah and I. Koto, “Implications of Parenting Patterns in the Development of Early Childhood Social Attitudes,” International Journal Reglement & Society, vol. 3, no. August, pp. 129–133, 2022.

[9] S. Sarjiyati, Taufiq Yuli Purnama, Anik Tri Haryani, Endang Murti, Izyan Farhana Zulkarnain, and Vivi Frita Trisnani, “Age Limit for Regional Head Candidates and Legal Considerations from the Supreme Court Decision No. 23 P/HUM/2024 and Constitutional Court Decision No. 70/PUU-XXII/2024,” Jurnal Jurisprudence, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 100–120, 2025, doi: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v15i2.10187.

[10] Z. Zainuddin and S. W. Sulaiman W., “Pola Dasar Pengasuhan Orang Tua Pada Anak Usia Dini Dalam Mewujudkan Anak Sholeh Perspektif Pendidikan Islam,” Indonesian Journal of Early Childhood: Jurnal Dunia Anak Usia Dini, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 329, 2022, doi: 10.35473/ijec.v4i2.1780.

[11] Salsa Octaviani S, D. Mulyadi, A. Permana, F. Asriani, M. D. Salman Fikry, and Z. N. Hidayat, “Comparison of Supreme Court and Constitutional Court Decisions Based on Legal Standing in Open Legal Policy Pilkada 2024,” Pubmedia Social Sciences and Humanities, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1–15, 2024, doi: 10.47134/pssh.v2i3.306.

[12] E. A. Putri, M. N. Antono, A. N. Kayati, A. D. Puspitasari, and F. Faisal, “Sosialisasi Pencegahan Kekerasan Seksual, Intoleransi, Dan Perundungan Di Sdn 1 Demangan Nganjuk Guna Meningkatkan Kewaspadaan Siswa,” Madiun Spoor : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 43–49, 2025, doi: 10.37367/jpm.v5i1.415.

[13] L. Zuhri, H. Ayu, and A. Atta, “Persyarat Calon Kepada Daerah dalam Pilkada 2024 , Tarik Menarik Putusan Mahkamah Agung Dengan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Requirements For Candidates For Regional Heads In The 2024 Regional Elections , Withdraw The Decision Of The Supreme Court With The ,” vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 147–160, 2024.

[14] R. Abduh and F. Riza, “Pemberian Bantuan Hukum Kepada Masyarakat Miskin Yang Mengajukan Gugatan Melalui Pos Bantuan Hukum Di Pengadilan Agama,” Jurnal EduTech, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 34, 2018.

[15] A. Magfiroh and I. Anisah, “Analisis Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 80/PUU-XIV/2016 tentang Kewarganegaraan,” Rechtenstudent, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 159–175, 2023, doi: 10.35719/rch.v4i2.269.

[16] A. Rahmi, U. Salamah, and F. U. Nasution, “The UNHCR Roles For Increasing Refugees Tenacity on the Pandemic Covid-19 Era,” Proceeding International Seminar on Islamic Studies, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 747–752, 2021.

[17] Mhd. T. S. Lubis, “Sistem Pemidanaan Bagi Anak Pengedar Narkotika Dengan Hukuman Pelatihan,” EduTech: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sosial, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 27–36, 2020, doi: 10.30596/edutech.v6i1.4392.

Downloads

Published

15-03-2026

How to Cite

Wulandari, P. W., & Andryan, A. (2026). Analysis of Constitutional Court Decision Number 70/PUU-XXII/2024 on the Age Requirement for Regional Head Candidates and Its Implications for the Democratic System in Indonesia. JHSS (Journal of Humanities and Social Studies), 10(1), 393–400. https://doi.org/10.33751/jhss.v10i1.69