Disharmony In The Regulation Of Campaign Props During Quiet Periods In Elections And Regional Elections In Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33751/jhss.v10i2.177Keywords:
campaign props, regulatory disharmony, quiet period, election, regional electionAbstract
This study aims to examine the regulatory disharmony concerning the removal of campaign props during the quiet period in Indonesian general elections and regional head elections. The study employed normative legal research using statutory and conceptual approaches, focusing on the comparison between Bawaslu Regulation Number 11 of 2023 and KPU Regulation Number 13 of 2024. The results show that disharmony arises from differences in removal deadlines, allocation of responsibility, and institutional roles. In the general election regime, campaign props must be removed no later than one day before voting day, while in the regional election regime they must be removed no later than three days before voting day. This difference creates uncertainty regarding participant obligations and weakens the effectiveness of electoral supervision. The originality of this study lies in its comparative analysis of campaign prop regulation across two electoral regimes and its linkage to legal certainty, electoral fairness, and supervisory effectiveness. Practically, the findings imply the need for harmonized deadlines, clearer participant responsibility, and stronger legal consequences for non-compliance. This study contributes to the development of electoral law by offering a normative framework for strengthening the quiet period as a neutral space that protects voter freedom and ensures equal treatment among election participants.
References
[1] M. Mutawalli, “Periodic Principles in General Elections,” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, vol. 23, no. 1, 2023.
[2] F. Arifin, “Reforming Indonesia’s Electoral System: Legal and Policy Perspectives,” Jambi Law Journal, 2025.
[3] Y. Suchyadi and N. Karmila, “The Application of Assignment Learning Group Methods Through Micro Scale Practicum to Improve Elementary School Teacher Study Program College Students’ Skills and Interests in Following Science Study Courses,” JHSS (Journal of Humanities and Social Studies), vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 95–98, 2019, doi: 10.33751/jhss.v3i2.1466.
[4] Y. Suchyadi, S. R. Indriyani, and D. Destiana, “Basic Concepts of Educational Supervision Along with Related Administrative Studies,” JHSS (Journal of Humanities and Social Studies), vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 406–410, 2023.
[5] H. Harisman, G. F. Prisanto, and N. F. Ernungtyas, “Pencarian Informasi Pemilu dan Persepsi Alat Peraga Kampanye pada Pemilih Pemula,” Jurnal Komunikasi Politik, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 120–134, 2021.
[6] N. Azizah et al., “Pemilu Hijau: Analisis Kebijakan Pemasangan Media Kampanye yang Ramah Lingkungan pada Pemilu 2024,” Ahmad Dahlan Legal Perspective, vol. 5, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.12928/adlp.v5i1.10634.
[7] L. R. Dewi, A. Polem, M. U. Lutfi, and Q. Nida, “Kewenangan Penertiban Alat Peraga Kampanye Pemilu Saat Masa Tenang Pemilu,” Jurnal Pengawasan Pemilu, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 35–52, 2022.
[8] A. Shalihah and E. Huroiroh, “The Optimization of Bawaslu’s Role in the 2024 Simultaneous Elections,” Jurnal Konstitusi, vol. 21, no. 3, 2024, doi: 10.31078/jk2139.
[9] Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum Nomor 11 Tahun 2023 tentang Pengawasan Kampanye Pemilihan Umum. Jakarta, Indonesia: Bawaslu RI, 2023.
[10] Komisi Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Komisi Pemilihan Umum Nomor 13 Tahun 2024 tentang Kampanye Pemilihan Gubernur dan Wakil Gubernur, Bupati dan Wakil Bupati, serta Wali Kota dan Wakil Wali Kota. Jakarta, Indonesia: KPU RI, 2024.
[11] D. G. Ashfiya, “Desain Ulang Konsep Penegakan Hukum Pemilu di Indonesia dalam Kerangka Pemilu Demokratis dan Berkeadilan,” Jurnal Kajian Konstitusi, vol. 1, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.19184/jkk.v1i1.23792.
[12] B. Alhuda, “Efektivitas Gakkumdu dalam Peraturan Bawaslu Nomor 31 Tahun 2018 Ditinjau dari Teori Penegakan Hukum,” Interdisciplinary Journal on Law, Social Sciences and Humanities, vol. 3, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.19184/idj.v3i2.34546.
[13] E. Lubis and M. A. Nedy, “Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Pemilu oleh Sentra Gakkumdu,” Jurnal Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, vol. 2, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.36085/jupank.v2i2.4789.
[14] N. A. Nst, A. Zarkasi, and Iswandi, “Pengawasan Bawaslu terhadap Pemasangan Alat Peraga Sebelum Masa Kampanye Pemilu Legislatif 2024,” Unes Journal of Swara Justisia, vol. 8, no. 3, 2024, doi: 10.31933/cq4wbt25.
[15] D. A. Permatasari and D. A. Wicaksono, “Electoral Governance and the Enforcement of Election Law in Indonesia,” Jurnal Rechts Vinding, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 205–222, 2023.
[16] P. M. Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, rev. ed. Jakarta, Indonesia: Kencana, 2017.
[17] I. M. P. Diantha, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum. Jakarta, Indonesia: Prenada Media, 2019.
[18] S. Soekanto and S. Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta, Indonesia: Rajawali Pers, 2015.
[19] D. N. Widowati and M. I. Sherly, “Analisis Pembatasan Kewenangan Bawaslu dalam Sentra Gakkumdu Perspektif Sosiologi Fungsionalis,” Tumoutou Social Science Journal, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 42–53, 2025, doi: 10.61476/qnvk3181.
[20] Y. H. Irawan, M. Nasir, and B. Bahreisy, “Peran Sentra Penegakan Hukum Terpadu dalam Penanganan Pelanggaran Pemilu Tahun 2024,” Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh, vol. 8, no. 2, 2025, doi: 10.29103/jimfh.v8i2.21172.
[21] K. A. Munawar and Hendra, “Peranan Sentra Penegakan Hukum Terpadu (Gakkumdu) dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Pemilu Money Politics pada Pemilihan Kepala Daerah 2024,” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik, vol. 5, no. 3, 2025, doi: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i3.4033.
[22] Endrawati, “Problematika Penegakan Hukum dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan Pemilu Ditinjau dari Perspektif Pengawas Pemilu,” Jurnal Huma Betang Demokrasi, vol. 1, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.55108/hbd.v1i1.189.
[23] M. Malik S., “Rekonstruksi Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Pemilu,” Jurnal Huma Betang Demokrasi, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 113–133, 2021, doi: 10.55108/hbd.v1i1.149.
[24] A. Sumodiningrat, “Menakar Transformasi Bawaslu Menjadi Lembaga Independen Peradilan Pemilukada,” Jurnal Konstitusi, vol. 19, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.31078/jk1918.
[25] M. Febriansyah, M. T. Ismail, and N. M. Noor, “Competing Not Complementing: KPU, Bawaslu, and the Dynamic of Election Monitoring in Pemilu 2019,” Asian Journal of Political Science, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 275–293, 2020, doi: 10.1080/02185377.2020.1781670.
[26] R. Bagja, “Towards Electoral Justice: Redesigning an Ideal System for Electoral Dispute Resolution in Indonesia,” Jambi Law Journal, 2025.
[27] F. B. Lestanto, “Efektivitas Gakkumdu dalam Penegakan Hukum Pemilu,” Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 2025.
[28] A. U. Harahap, A. Busro, E. A. Priyono, and B. Sumardiana, “Legal Framework for Resolving Election Violations in Indonesia: Towards Electoral Justice,” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 985–1014, 2025, doi: 10.15294/ijcls.v10i2.24541.
