Evaluation Of The Implementation Of The Bilingual Program At Insan Rabbany Junior High School In South Tangerang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33751/jhss.v10i1.42Keywords:
bilingual programme, context evaluation, input evaluation, process evaluation, product evaluationAbstract
This journal aims to collect data and information about the implementation of the bilingual programme at Insan Rabbany Junior High School in South Tangerang. The method used is qualitative, namely to find out how the programme can be implemented, the extent to which the programme has been implemented, and the achievement of the programme's objectives. Data collection was carried out through observation, interviews, documentation studies and literature studies. Interviews were conducted with the director of education, the principal, science, mathematics and English teachers, students and parents. The information required was related to the implementation of the bilingual programme that had been run by the school. The findings of the evaluation included a context evaluation covering the objectives of the bilingual programme, which were in line with the school's vision and mission of preparing a globally-minded young generation; an input evaluation consisting of the bilingual programme curriculum, which was the national curriculum but delivered using two languages, with the abilities of students and teachers still needing to be improved, and facilities and infrastructure already in place; process evaluation, which includes planning, implementation, and assessment of bilingual learning; and product evaluation, which includes the results and impact of the bilingual programme on the school, students, teachers, and parents. The implications felt by the school with the bilingual programme are an increase in prestige and quality of education, students having high self-confidence and competitiveness, and having good analytical skills. Teachers are motivated to continue developing themselves and become more creative, innovative and globally minded. Parents receive excellent service from the school and are better prepared to plan for the next level of education, ready to compete in the era of globalisation.
References
[1] Arifin, Zainal. 2019. Programme Evaluation. Bandung: Rosdakarya.
[2] Ansyar, Mohamad. 2017. Curriculum: Essence, Foundation, Design and Development. Jakarta: Kencana.
[3] Arikunto, S. & Abdul Jabar, C.S. 2014. Educational Programme Evaluation: Theoretical and Practical Guidelines for Students and Education Practitioners. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
[4] Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2009. Educational Programme Evaluation: Theoretical and Practical Guidelines for Students and Education Practitioners. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
[5] Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2013. Research Procedures: A Practical Approach. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
[6] Arikunto Suharsimi. 2009. Fundamentals of Educational Evaluation. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
[7] Artini, Luh Putu, Nitiasih, & Putu Kerti. 2014. Bilingualism and Bilingual Education. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
[8] Baker, Colin. 2001. Foundations of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. New York: Briddles Ltd.
[9] Bukhori, Adkha. 2017. Bilingual Science Class Programme at MAN Demak (SWOT Analysis Study).
[10] Chairunnissa, Connie. 2017. Scientific Research Methods Applied in Education and Social Sciences. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media.
[11] Dananjaya, Utomo. 2013. Active Learning Media. Bandung: Nuansa Cendekia.
[12] Eko Prayitno, Sutarto Hadi, and Muhammad Saleh. 2019. The Bilingual School Programme Management. Journal of K6, Education, and Management (J-K6EM) Vol. 2, No. 1, 2019, pp. 64-70.
[13] Farida, Hanun. 2018. High-Achieving Madrasahs with Bilingual Classes. Jurnal Dialog Vol. 41 (1) June 2018.
[14] Ghani, Abd, Rahman A. 2014. School Action Research Methodology. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
[15] Ghani, Abd, Rahman A 2015. Handout for the Educational Programme Evaluation Course. UHAMKA Postgraduate School.
[16] Ghani, Abd, Rahman A. 2016. Classroom Action Research Methodology. Depok: Rajagrafindo Persada.
[17] Gracia, Eugene E, Jose E, & Nanes Sr. 2011. Bilingualism and cognition: informing research, pedagogy and policy. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
[18] Harasusilo, Y.E. 2019. Latest PISA Scores: 5 Education Challenges in the Nadiem Makarim Era. https://edukasi.kompas.com/
[19] Haryanto, Eddy. 2018. Analysis of Bilingual Policy. Yogyakarta: Textium
[20] Hikmat. 2014. Education Management. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
[21] J.F Harmers, Michael H.A. Blanc. 2000. Bilinguality and Bilingualism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[22] Kurniawan, Dody. 2013. Evaluation of Foreign Language Development Programmes. Journal of Education Evaluation 4 (1) March 2013: 1-11
[23] Lafendry, Ferdinal. 2018. Great Teacher: Shaping Children with Character. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama
[24] Lendo, Oktavia, Tamzil, & Fachmi. 2018. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Bilingual Learning Programmes on the Communication Proficiency of Grade 2 Students at Budi Luhur Pondok Aren Elementary School. Scientific Forum 15 (2) May 2018.
[25] Lexy J. Melong. 2011. Qualitative Research Methodology, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
[26] McDavid, James C., Hawthorne, & Laura, L.R. 2006. Programme Evaluation and Performance Measurement. California: Sage Publications Inc.
[27] Margana, & Sukarno. 2011. Development of a Bilingual Learning Model in Vocational High Schools. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION. 41 (1) May 2011, Pages 79 - 93
[28] Mulyana, Deddy. 2018. Qualitative Research Methods. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya
[29] Murwani, Santosa. 2003. Guidelines for Writing Theses and Dissertations. Jakarta: UHAMKA Press.
[30] Murwani, Santosa. 2018. Handout on Scientific Research Methodology. Jakarta: Uhamka
[31] Nugraheni, Aninditya Sri. Implementation of the Bilingual School Programme to Improve Linguistic Intelligence at SD INTIS SCHOOL YOGYAKARTA. Journal of Education and Learning. 4 (1) June 2017.
[32] Pancawati, Widya. (2020). The Benefits of Bilingualism for Child Development. http://id.theasianparent.com
[33] Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2002). Learning for the 21st Century. A Report and Mile Guide for 21st Century Skills. Washington, DC: Partnership for 21st Century Skills.
[34] Pranowo. 2015. Language Learning Theory: For Language Educators and Language Students. Pustaka Pelajar. Yogyakarta.
[35] R. Sanders James, Chair. 1994. The Programme Evaluation Standards.2ndEdition. California: Sage Publications Inc.
[36] Santoso, Didik., & Ginting, Pirman. 2015. Bilingual Education Programmes at Junior High Schools. Jakarta: Prenademedia Group.
[37] Satori, D: Meriawan, D. & Komariah, Aan. 2013. School Management Capacity Development Model to Improve Education Quality. Education Administration. 17(1) October 2013: 184 – 192
[38] SMP Insan Rabbany. 2020. Document 1: SMP Insan Rabbany Curriculum. South Tangerang.
[39] Sugiyono, (2017). Research and Development Methods. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.
[40] Suwardi, Basrowi. 2008. Understanding Qualitative Research. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
[41] Tersiana, Andra. 2018. Research Methods. Yogyakarta: Start up.
[42] Compilation Team. 2013. Thesis and Dissertation Writing Guidelines. UHAMKA Postgraduate School. Jakarta: UHAMKA Press.
[43] Tri Angga Dewi. 2016. Implementation of bilingual classes at SMP Negeri 1 Baturetno. Journal of Education Policy. Edition 2 Vol. V Year 2016.
[44] Wirawan. 2011. Evaluation of Standard Application and Professional Theory Models. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
[45] Yaumi, Muhammad and Nurdin Ibrahim. 2013. Multiple Intelligences-Based Learning: Identifying and Developing Children's Multitalents. Kencana. Jakarta.
[46] Yusuf, Muri. 2015. Assessment and Evaluation in Education: Pillars of Information Provision and Quality Control Activities in Education. Jakarta: Kencana.
