Transformation Of Post-Production Fishery Revenue Policy: Bureaucratic Reform At Jakarta Nizam Zachman Oceanic Fishing Port
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33751/jhss.v10i1.51Keywords:
post-production fishery revenue policy (PHP), bureaucratic reform, good governance, public service, fishing portAbstract
In response to the increasing challenges in managing fishery resources and the need for sustainable funding, the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries of the Republic of Indonesia (MMAF) has implemented a post-production fishery revenue (PHP) policy, replacing the previous pre-production policy. This policy serves as a crucial instrument to support the sustainability of the fishery sector. This study employs a qualitative approach, utilizing in-depth interviews and document analysis to assess the perspectives of various stakeholders, including representatives from businesses, data collection officers, and port authorities, with a focus on the Jakarta Nizam Zachman Oceanic Fishing Port (JNZOFP) in Jakarta. The research identifies the fulfillment of bureaucratic reform areas in the implementation of post-production PHP policy, and emphasizes principles of good governance. The findings indicate that the post-production PHP policy at JNZOFP meets several indicators of bureaucratic reform and aligns with good governance principles. Furthermore, the study highlights both supporting factors and challenges affecting the implementation of this policy. MMAF is advised to integrate post-production PHP policy into the work plan of JNZOFP as a performance indicator. This integration is expected to enhance oversight and accountability, thereby significantly improving program effectiveness. Additionally, JNZOFP must formulate more effective strategies to address emerging challenges, such as data accuracy during weighing processes, updating the e-PIT system, human resource composition, and the availability of supporting facilities.
References
[1] Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. London: Pearson Education Limited.
[2] Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, Edition 3. USA: Sage Publications Ltd.
[3] Khandaker, S. & Khan, A. (2016). A Critical Insight into Policy Implementation and Implementation Performance. Public Policy and Administration, vol. 15(4), 538-548.
[4] Azizah, Y. et al. (2023). The Condition of Fish Stocks in WPPNRI 573. Fisheries Resources Center of Indonesia, Rekam Nusantara Foundation.
[5] Anderson, J. E. (2010). Public Policy Making: An Introduction. Boston: Wadsworth.
[6] Cahyarani, A. (2023). Perceptions of Fishing Vessel Owners Based at Ocean Fishing Port of Nizam Zachman Jakarta Regarding the Implementation of Measurable Fisheries Policies. AGRIKAN - Journal of Fisheries Agribusiness, Vol. 16 No. 2: 106-111.
[7] Nurlaela, E. (2023). Measurable Fish Capture: Challenges and Implementation. In K. Amri, H. Latuconsina, & R. Triyanti (Eds.), Management of Sustainable Marine Fisheries Resources (267–314). Publisher: BRIN. DOI: 10.55981/brin.908.c759 E-ISBN: 978-623-8372-50-8.
[8] Prasojo, E., Kurniawan, T. (2003). Bureaucratic Reform and Good Governance: Case Best Practices from Several Regions in Indonesia. Indonesian Anthropology Journal.
[9] Samosir, P.A. et al. (2014). Analysis of the Potential for Non-Tax State Revenue in the Capture Fisheries Sector. Borneo Administrator Journal, Volume 10, No. 2, 2014.
[10] Widowati, D.A. et al. (2019). Implementation of Good Governance Principles in Sustainable Fisheries Management Regulations in Indonesia. Et Pax Journal, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2019.
[11] Rizalsan, A., Juwono, V. (2020). Implementation of the Special Economic Zone Development Policy in Tanjung Kelayang. Borneo Administrator Journal, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2020.
[12] Schultz, D. (2004). Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy. New York: Facts on File Inc.
[13] Center for APBN Policy, Fiscal Policy Agency, Ministry of Finance (2020). Non-Tax State Revenue in the Marine and Fisheries Sector Based on Natural Resources: "Governance and Optimization".
[14] Budget Study Center, DPR Expert Agency (2019). APBN Bulletin, Vol. 7, Edition 7, April 2019.
[15] Core Bulletin of Non-Tax State Revenue, Edition 12, March 2023.
[16] Policy Brief from the Ombudsman (2023). Public Service Oversight on Quota and Zone-Based PIT Policies, Vol. 1, Year 2023.
[17] Ombudsman Systematic Study Report (2023). Public Service Oversight on the Implementation of Quota and Zone-Based PIT Policies, Vol. 1, Year 2023.
[18] Government Regulation (PP) No. 85 of 2021 on Types and Rates of Non-Tax State Revenue Applicable to the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries.
[19] Regulation of the Minister of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform of the Republic of Indonesia No. 18 of 2021 on the Road Map for Bureaucratic Reform of the Ministry of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform for 2020-2024.
[20] Regulation of the Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries No. 2 of 2023 on Requirements and Procedures for Imposing Rates on Types of Non-Tax State Revenue Applicable to the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries from the Utilization of Fisheries Natural Resources.
[21] Regulation of the Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries of the Republic of Indonesia No. 1 of 2023 on Procedures for Determining the Production Value of Fish Upon Landing.
[22] Performance Report of the Directorate General of Capture Fisheries for 2023.
[23] Performance Report of the Nizam Zachman Jakarta Ocean Fishing Port for 2023.
[24] Post-Production Non-Tax State Revenue Report of the Nizam Zachman Jakarta Ocean Fishing Port for 2023.
[25] Post-Production Non-Tax State Revenue Report of the Nizam Zachman Jakarta Ocean Fishing Port for 2024.
[26] https://www.menpan.go.id/site/reformasi-birokrasi/makna-dan-tujuan1
[27] https://fahum.umsu.ac.id/pengertian-good-governance-ciri-dan-prinsi/
