Juridical Analysis Of The Fulfillment Of Suspects' Rights At The Stage Of Handing Over Suspects And Evidence Based On Law Number 20 Of 2025 Concerning The Criminal Procedure Code
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33751/jhss.v10i2.240Keywords:
Criminal Procedure Code 2025, Suspect Rights, Dominus LitisAbstract
This study aims to examine the regulation regarding the fulfillment of suspects' rights in Phase II, namely the submission of suspects and evidence based on Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Criminal Code, and analyze the role of the prosecutor as a dominus litis in ensuring its implementation. The background of this study shows that the reform of the criminal procedure law has expanded the guarantee of protection of the rights of suspects, but in practice it still poses various obstacles to implementation, especially in the administrative aspects, inter-agency coordination, and the readiness of law enforcement officials. The method used is normative juridical with an approach to laws and regulations, legal doctrines, and relevant literature studies. The results of the study show that the 2025 Criminal Procedure Code strengthens the application of the principle of due process of law through the expansion of the rights of suspects, although its implementation still faces obstacles in the form of gaps between norms and practices as well as coordination between institutions. The discussion emphasized that the prosecutor has a strategic position as a dominus litis in supervising the fulfillment of the rights of suspects and maintaining the integration of the criminal justice system. In conclusion, the effectiveness of protecting the rights of suspects is highly dependent on the consistency of implementation, the effectiveness of supervision mechanisms, and integrated coordination between law enforcement agencies.
References
[1] N. D. Irmawanti, B. N. Arief, F. Hukum, And U. Diponegoro, “Urgensi Tujuan Dan Pedoman Pemidanaan Dalam Rangka Pembaharuan Sistem Pemidanaan Hukum Pidana,” Vol. 3, Pp. 217–227, 2021.
[2] A. Sahtia, “Akomodasi Hukum Yang Hidup Dalam Kuhp Baru Indonesia Menurut Perspektif Hukum Progresif,” Vol. 20, No. 02, Pp. 115–127, 2023.
[3] S. El Et Al., “Perubahan Sistem Dan Praktik Hukum Pidana Indonesia Sebagai Akibat Berlakunya Kuhp Baru,” Pp. 494–507.
[4] I. Suwandi, “Problematika Pengaturan Kewenangan Aparat Penegak Hukum Dalam Kuhap 2025 Ditinjau Dari Prinsip Due Process Of Law,” Vol. 2, No. 2, Pp. 53–65, 2025.
[5] E. K. Tarigan, E. Darmayanti, D. S. Amaniarsih, And B. D. Simatupang, “Tinjauan Yuridis Perbandingan Kuhp Lama Dan Kuhp Baru,” Vol. 18, Pp. 590–604, 2026.
[6] D. L. Sonata, “Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Empiris: Karakteristik Khas Dari Metode Meneliti Hukum Depri,” Fiat Justisia J. Ilmu Huk., Vol. 8, No. 1, Pp. 15–35, 2014.
[7] D. Dinanti, D. Universal, H. Asasi, And H. A. Manusia, “Perlindungan Hukum Atas Hak-Hak Tersangka Pada Proses Penyidikan Perkara Pidana Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia,” 1981.
[8] W. Contributors, “Herbert Leslie Packer,” 2026. [Online]. Available: Https://Id.Wikipedia.Org/Wiki/Herbert_Leslie_Packer
[9] T. Hukumonline, “Teori Perlindungan Hukum Menurut Para Ahli,” 2022, Hukumonline.Com. [Online]. Available: Https://Www.Hukumonline.Com/Berita/A/Teori-Perlindungan-Hukum-Menurut-Para-Ahli-Lt63366cd94dcbc
[10] A. E. Gerungan, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Rahasia Dagang Ditinjau Dari Aspek Hukum Perdata Dan Pidana Di Indonesia,” J. Huk. Unsrat, Vol. 22, No. 5, Pp. 69–84, 2016, [Online]. Available: Https://Ejournal.Unsrat.Ac.Id/V3/Index.Php/Jurnalhukumunsrat/Article/View/10758/10346
[11] A. C. Rasina Padeni Nasution, Swity Milen, Kahyun Irgi Ramadhan, Kamilatunnisa Sitorus, “Praktek Due Process Of Law Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia Di Tinjau Dari Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Medan Tahun 2022-2023,” J. Begawan Huk., Vol. 2, No. 1, 2024.
[12] M. Latifah And P. J. Hairi, “Pengaturan Pedoman Pemidanaan Kuhp Baru Dan Implikasinya Pada Putusan Hakim,” Vol. 15, No. November, Pp. 25–51, 2024.
[13] E. Kurniawan, Y. O. S. J. Utama, And R. Herawati, “Integrated Criminal Justice System Model In Indonesia,” Seybold Rep., Vol. 8, No. 2022, Pp. 2362–2372, 1ad, Doi: 10.17605/Osf.Io/6u9fe.
[14] R. Muhammad, “Penyelenggaraan Peradilan Pidana (Studi Tentang: Model-Model Dan Faktor-Faktor Yang Berperan Dalam Peradilan Pidana),” J. Huk., Vol. 20, No. 9, Pp. 42–54, 2002.
[15] N. Tolingguhu, R. Al Asfah, T. Meutia, And N. Auliya, “Penerapan Asas Due Process Of Law Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana Di Indonesia,” J. Huk. Bisnis, Vol. 4, No. 1, Pp. 16–27, 2026.
[16] Juan Daud Putra Siahaan And I. G. N. N. K. Yudiantara, “Penerapan Nilai-Nilai Crime Control Model (Ccm) Dan Due Process Model (Dpm) Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia Oleh:,” J. Media Akad., Vol. 3, No. 7, Pp. 1–10, 2025, Doi: 10.62281.
[17] Marulak Pardede, “Penegakan Hukum Vs Budaya Hukum Indonesia,” Rechtsvinding Online J., Vol. العدد الحا, Pp. 1–11, 2017, [Online]. Available: Http://Www.Helpa-Prometheus.Gr/Διαγνωστικές-Εξετάσεις-Για-Τον-Καρκί/
[18] J. Hukum, “Perlindungan Terhadap Hak-Hak Tersangka Dalam Proses Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Ditinjau Dari Aspek Hak Asasi Manusia,” Vol. 10, Pp. 13–30, 2024.
[19] R. E. Turnip, “Konsep Dasar Terkait Due Process Of Law,” J. Huk. Justice, Vol. 3, No. 2, Pp. 221–231, 2026.
[20] R. B. Widiyantoro, “Harmonisasi Paradigma Kuhp Dan Kuhap Baru : Menuju Sistem Hukum Pidana Nasional Yang Progresif,” J. Huk. Inklusi Indones., Vol. 1, No. 1, Pp. 57–66, 2026.
[21] A. B. Waskito, “Implementasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Dalam Perspektif Integrasi,” J. Daulat Huk., Vol. 1, No. 1, Pp. 287–304, 2018.
[22] S. Mh. Supriyanto, “Perkembangan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Oleh,” 2020.
[23] M. Emirsya, “Penerapan Asasdominuslitisoleh Jaksapenuntut Umum Dalam Tindak Pidana Umum Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2021 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang- Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia,” J. Ilm. Mhs. Fak. Huk., Vol. 8, No. 3, Pp. 1–17, 2025.
[24] L. A. Z. Muhammad Azzrul Radhiansyah, “Kewenangan Dominus Litis Jaksa Dalam Peradilan Pidana Indonesia: Problematika Bolak-Balik Berkas Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Muhammad,” Lex J. Kaji. Huk. Keadilan, Vol. 9, No. 4, Pp. 903–939, 2025, Doi: Https://Doi.Org/10.25139/Lex.V9i4.11115.
[25] Adery Ardhan Saputro, “Peran Kejaksaan Ri Sebagai Dominus Litis Dalam Kekisruhan Kpk Vs Polri,” 2025.
[26] F. Hukum, U. Udayana, N. N. Adiyaryani, F. Hukum, And U. Udayana, “Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia,” Vol. 15, No. 10, 2025.
[27] A. Firmansy, “Tinjauan Hukum Kewenangan Jaksa Dalam Pemeriksaan Tambahan Menurut Asas Dominus Litis Berdasarkan Kuhap,” Jurisdictie, Vol. 2, No. 1, Pp. 55–80, 2020.
[28] M. M. Dedy Chandra Sihombing, Alvi Syahrin, Madiasa Ablisar, “Penguatan Kewenangan Jaksa Selaku Dominus Litis Sebagai Upaya Optimalisasi Penegakan Hukum Pidana Berorientasi Keadilan Restoratif,” Locus J. Konsep Ilmu Huk. E-Issn, Vol. 3, No. 2, Pp. 64–75, 2023.
[29] V. Wati, M. C. Umam, And K. El Hf, “Eksistensi Dominus Litis Dalam Peradilan Koneksitas: Rekonstruksi Peran Kejaksaan Pasca–Pembentukan Jam-Pidmil,” Jmandia Cendikia J. Ilm. Penelit. Multidisiplin Ilmu, Vol. 4, No. 3, Pp. 10–28, 2021.
